AM DEBATING WHETHER IT'S NECESSARY to have a Kindle or, alternatively, an iPad. As a frequent buyer of books, Amazon offered me a K with a discount of £10 off.
Now, technology is not one of my fortes; either would doubtless cause repeated perusals of their 'books of words'. However, do the benefits outweigh the possible negatives?
I can't, at present, see that the iPad's add-ons would enable it to exceed the laptop's capabilities but, on the other hand, the laptop is heavy, especially when you're lugging a suitcase through an airport. Portability has to be a plus in that respect.
The Amazon keyboard Kindle 3G is Wi-fi enabled, and a whole lot cheaper, but it doesn't sport all the iPad's capabilities.
It's very noticeable, buying books, that e~books are on the up and up. But – big 'but' – a Kindle only displays a page of one book at a time. Not a lot of assistance in research, when one's desk / table is covered with various volumes lying open for consultation.
Investigations are ongoing. Research is required!
Current reading is catholic and wide-ranging. Greeks are largely confined to thesis material, but I picked up Christian Cameron's 'Marathon' at the airport a couple of months ago. It's essentially another of those swords-and-sandals fictions, but – unlike its Roman equivalents (apart from the excellent creator of M. Didius Falco!) – is surprisingly easy to read. The military scenarios are a mite OTT for this lady reader, but thank goodness for a writer on ancient Greece who knows the hoplite carried an aspis (shield) and that designating this as a hoplon displays woeful ignorance of ancient Greek militaria.
Volume 3 of Chris's Greek chronicle, Poseidon's Spear, is due out in hardback on 13 September, 2012. As I shall be in transit through various frontiers, I'll try and pick up one of those airport soft cover editions, although I'm not, as yet, sufficiently enamoured to read the first volume of the saga, Killer of Men.
Besides, my reviewing of anything these days has gone the way of all flesh – the practice is RIP, pro tem. No TIME.
Do these triads of volumes reflect the three book deals as dished out by the modern conglomerate publishers?
Alternative entertainment has been provided by Mary Beard's recent 'All in a Don's Day' (sent by MB, gratis, as one has a comment published therein!) and Marilyn Skinner's 'The Tribune's Sister', on the Roman Clodia Metelli. Maligned by Cicero, the sister of pretty-boy Clodius Pulcher has a meretricious reputation, which Skinner has duly dismantled page by page – and convincingly, too. However, as a sometime legal student (passée), I would say the circumstantial 'evidence' could be easily twisted for the prosecution. Moreover, in those far-off days, what you didn't know you could always invent.
History's opinions take a lot of shifting. The scandalous and salacious is often preferred over more pedestrian accuracy. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
Prowling around Blackwell's and Waterstone's (as I do) I realise many of 'my' authors are considerably less than well-known, and many consigned to the dustbin of history.
Cecil Lewis (not C.S., although C.S. isn't exactly a non-favourite): little-known; Richard Frere on Scotland: Storm Jameson, PEN littérateur extraordinaire, John Fowles' Aristos (not all his oeuvre: the fiction's very uneven) Freya Stark, pioneering lady of intellectual style and amazing energy; Powell (Dilys, not the Anthony who's surname rhymes with 'pole') ...
These were all of different ages and stages: you don't re-read books that you read as a 'teen. At least, not habitually, not for a 'new experience', anyway – nostalgia for your past is different.
Add to these heavy-weights of literature such as Woolf, and a plethora of poets from the Gawain writer on to moderns, Cecil Day-Lewis (what is it with all these C. Lewis's? Must be confusing for foreign students) and T.S. Eliot (of course), leavened with dictionaries and reference volumes, foreign language selections and titles culled from the more literary sections of SF, e.g., Poul Anderson's The Broken Sword, it all adds up to a weirdly varied collection.
Booksellers' stores are piled high with books but I rarely find anything I want to read. There is a huge mass of modern authorial offerings on sale, but all the puffery of TV plugs rolls off me like water from the proverbial duck's back. There's just so much stuff – forests'-worth of paper and obviously profitable work for the binderies, but how much of it will still be here a hundred years hence? Physical books last. However, the computer and its varied offspring have virtually replaced man's need for memory. The long-ago oral culture of the Greeks had the whole of Homer off by heart – we have IT and Google instead.
The sociology of literary taste is well-documented, but the pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap sector of the current market seems oversupplied. And fashions come and go. Freestanding stacks of Twilight vampires replaced the promotions of J. K. Rowling's boy wizard, and now droves of middle-class yummy mummies have been taking Fifty Shades of Grey and its sequels to the cash desk. I, personally, could not be brought to review vampires for all the tea in China, nor indeed a cheap melodramatic Mills & Boon-style fantasy saga of sado-masochism. It's even in Tesco, right next door to the children's sections - but O, boy, do these sell! – albeit carefully concealed beneath frozen peas, cat food and the pink-topped gossip mags. (I am an inveterate inspector of other people's supermarket trolleys.)
Guess selling's what it's all about, innit?
Well, there's one advantage of the Kindle: no one can readily identify what you're reading!
Still, I'm attached to the heft of a proper book, and the feel and scent of new purchases.
Other women buy shoes to indulge themselves: I buy books.
Am finding online research and surfing the 'Net has led to a lack of concentration ability – a sort of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) involving compulsive checking of email accounts and idle time-consuming exercises generally. This is Not a Good Thing.
Och, well – a pile of must-reads is sitting here, glowering at me across the desk. I find research takes so much time because every single obscure reference, every source, must be meticulously documented, and some of mine go back to the 1980s, or earlier pre- Internet days. Chasing down these takes forever. I have an eidetic memory for text, but even when a quote or whatever stays in my head, its author, title or year of publication usually doesn't.
![]() |
| Book stacks in the JCL |
Some libraries and librarians are vastly superior to others. I don't know what I'd do without the Joint Classical Library at Senate House. The JL's helpful staff are walking miracles of specialist information, far in excess of any online search engine.
I soon gave up on our local municipal library. It caters for the general public, and readers of popular fiction, and the reference section's always full of local history nuts and people researching genealogical records, as is the National Library of Scotland. I can't see the attraction of hunting down forebears. I know who mine are, anyway – and besides, I have quite enough trouble living this life without bothering overmuch about someone else's way back in time.
I nicked an ancestor's name as a nom de plume, and am amused to note that although there is an extant record of their birth there's no equivalent date of death. I know where they're buried but obviously the powers-that-be don't, for some unknown reason. These days, when we are tracked from the cradle to the grave, this appears to be an omission on the part of the government's clerks and desk-wallahs.
May was out of the ordinary. There were novel interruptions (aka 'distractions') and une petite crise familiale. Also, a supervisors' team meeting decided what I need to do next in order to prepare for upgrade. It does seem early for this, but I require a) a literature review, b) a further research proposal (ca. 6,000 words in total); c) a skills audit, d) a thesis plan and e) a timetable. On top of that lot, there's an abstract to be written for a 2013 conference, and more.
Mamma mia! This is combined with daily routines and necessities – or not, as is too often the case.
So, better get on with it.
And I thought Classical research would mean shuttling between the academic specialist libraries of Edinburgh, Cambridge, Oxford, London, Athens and Rome, or pleasant meanderings around the Med.'s Greek and Roman ruins clutching Loeb Classic volumes and notepads and clad in becoming drifty dresses ruffled by the winds off ancient seas, like Bettany Hughes in long-shot.
How wrong can you be?
#1 daughter sent me a link from cat fans' icanhascheezburger.com site – 'There are two types of people in this world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data ...' Perforce, of necessity, one's unquestionably in the same place. These people have delved into Greek epigraphy. I promptly copied and despatched the link around. An Arabist friend in Oxford riposted with: 'Nice! This isn't the same, but rather an Afghan proverb (in Pashto) that describes my current procrastination and inattention:
طالبه خداى كه به ملا سې
په كتاب پروت يې شينكى خالونه
'Student, damned if you'll become a mullah. You hunch over your book thinking of beauty spots.'
Yep. Got it in one, J.! I ain't aiming to become a mullah (gender-barred, anyway) but hunched over books and thinking of something else entirely is right on the money.
On the upside, May was also quite fruitful – although mountains were in labour to produce one small mouse. I received a .pdf of a thesis I'd been searching for, from an academic Down Under in NZ. The kindness of some people in the field is amazing. The list of contributors to one's efforts is growing; the bibliography's going to be longer than the work itself.
She wrote: 'The [...] delaying factor was MS Word, which had kindly rearranged all the margins so that the page numbers bore only a faint resemblance to the table of contents. This seemed to me to be worth getting right, although Word proved surprisingly (or perhaps not surprisingly) reluctant to cooperate.'
Ah, yes. This is another latter-day problem which looms. People get cross with me, because I don't comply with up-to-the-minute submission tech. Everything, but everything, is online these days. And now there is the Mystery of the E~book to solve. This is all very well but I've been writing a long, long time and am def. a Luddite, a paper sort of a gal. One guy's written:
'Jane! One does NOT italicise! One emphasises, hence <em> </em>.
'And why do we do all this [...]? Quite correct, we are writing for an international audience who have very different character sets, but all use the lowest common denominators.
'Very good, pleased I have your rapt attention!'
The man has chutzpah, tho', makes me smile. At least he's funnier than some. Smart sarcasm and crits often emerge as bitchiness.
Too much to do, too little time.
Nevertheless, my fondness for italics remains.
Well, June's upon us – and although the last of May granted us some very hot days, no sign as yet of anything like proper summer; much water in the skies here, not enough down south. There's the usual haar on the hill in the mornings. Not that I see much of the sun when it does shine. There should be a health warning attached to research: studying too much affects health, and uptake of Vit. D, etc. (This is why I decamp to Italy or Greece every year. Not enough sun-manufactured serotonin in Scotland guarantees long grey depressing winters).
I recently ran an all-time check on blog posts. One, and only one, has exceeded the thousand mark: 4 July 2011.Will someone tell me why this is?! (I have a very good idea of the reason, but I do wonder how often, and where, it's been seen, read or forwarded on ... Primarily, it seems, in the US.)
I recently ran an all-time check on blog posts. One, and only one, has exceeded the thousand mark: 4 July 2011.Will someone tell me why this is?! (I have a very good idea of the reason, but I do wonder how often, and where, it's been seen, read or forwarded on ... Primarily, it seems, in the US.)















